Before You Begin
Question #44101
The Question
An aqueous solution contains at . To this, an equal volume of a buffer solution containing of an aromatic amine () and of its corresponding hydrochloride salt () is added. This experiment is performed separately with three different amines: Ligand I: 4-Methylaniline Ligand II: Aniline Ligand III: 2-Methylaniline
The formation of the linear complex competes with the precipitation of (). A student hypothesizes that since methyl groups exert a +I effect, Ligand III should be a stronger electron donor than Ligand II, thereby forming a more stable complex and reducing the likelihood of precipitation.
Which of the following correctly identifies the actual outcome regarding the precipitation of and the primary chemical principle responsible?
Options
- A.
Precipitation of is most extensive with Ligand III; the ortho-effect induces severe steric hindrance that drastically lowers the complex formation constant (), maximizing the free available to exceed .
- B.
Precipitation of is least extensive with Ligand III; the proximity of the ortho-methyl group provides additional inductive stabilization to the complex, keeping free below the precipitation threshold.
- C.
Precipitation of is most extensive with Ligand I; the strong +I and hyperconjugation effects of the para-methyl group increase the basicity of the amine, leading to the preferential precipitation of .
- D.
Precipitation of is identical across all three solutions; the common ion effect of the overwhelmingly dominates, as aromatic amines are too weakly basic to form stable coordination complexes with .
Check Your Answer
Correct Answer
Step-by-Step Solution
Explanation
How the Examiner Thinks
Mechanism_Trap
Don't get tricked by the process! Learn the mechanical traps used in competitive exam questions.
Concepts Behind This Question
Solubility Product (Ksp) vs. Ionic Product (Qsp)|Ortho-Effect in Anilines
Why This Question Is Tricky
Common Mistakes
The question tests the 'Ortho-Effect' as a critical exception to standard electronic substituent effects in coordination chemistry.
Students often mechanically apply inductive (+I) and mesomeric (+M) effects to predict ligand strength, assuming that any electron-donating group will increase basicity and complex stability.
The trap lies in assuming 2-methylaniline is a better ligand than aniline due to the methyl group's +I effect.
However, the hidden variable is steric hindrance (F-strain).
The ortho-methyl group physically blocks the approach of the bulky silver ion, drastically lowering the formation constant of the complex.
This failure to complex the silver ion allows the traditional common ion effect (from the chloride in the buffer) to dominate, leading to unexpected precipitation.
Quick Facts About This Question
Question Information
| Subject | Chemistry |
| Chapter | Equilibrium - Class 11 Part 1 |
| Concept | Solubility Product (Ksp) vs. Ionic Product (Qsp) |
| Difficulty | 8 |
| Cognitive Load | 7 |
| Target Solve Time | 160 sec |
| Access | Free |