Start Learning Free

Before You Begin

Question #44130

Difficulty: 8/10 | 🟢 Free

The Question

An actinoid oxide, \ce{M_xO_y} (Compound \textbf{P}), exhibits an average oxidation state of +5.33+5.33 for the metal \ce{M}. Upon fluorination with excess \ce{F2(g)} at 700 K700\text{ K}, \textbf{P} is completely converted into a volatile, diamagnetic, octahedral fluoride, \ce{MF6} (Compound \textbf{Q}). Compound \textbf{Q} is known to be a covalent molecule rather than an ionic solid.

Which of the following correctly identifies the actual oxidation states of \ce{M} in \textbf{P}, and the primary quantum mechanical reason for the stability of the +6+6 oxidation state in \textbf{Q}?

Options

  • A.

    +4+4 and +6+6; Indirect relativistic expansion of 5f5f orbitals, allowing their participation in strong covalent \ce{M-F} bonds.

  • B.

    +4+4 and +6+6; Relativistic contraction of 5f5f orbitals, which shields the nuclear charge and stabilizes the \ce{M^{6+}} ionic lattice.

  • C.

    +5+5 and +6+6; High electronegativity of fluorine overcoming the inert pair effect of the 7s7s electrons.

  • D.

    +5.33+5.33 (delocalized); The small size of the \ce{F^-} ion minimizes steric hindrance around the central \ce{M} atom.

Check Your Answer

Correct Answer

Step-by-Step Solution

Explanation

How the Examiner Thinks

Exception_Exposure

Learn to identify edge cases and boundary exceptions that JEE examiners hide in math problems.

Concepts Behind This Question

Average vs. Actual Oxidation State|Actinoid Oxidation State Variety|Stability of High O.S. Fluorides/Oxides

Why This Question Is Tricky

Common Mistakes

This question tests the distinction between mathematical average oxidation states and actual discrete oxidation states in mixed-valence compounds (e.g., \ce{U3O8}).

The primary trap lies in the misapplication of 'Relativistic Contraction'.

Students often memorize that relativistic effects cause contraction (like the inert pair effect in post-transition metals).

However, they fail to realize that while ss and pp orbitals contract, dd and ff orbitals undergo indirect relativistic expansion.

This expansion is the exact reason why early actinoids (like U, Np, Pu) can utilize their 5f5f orbitals for covalent bonding to achieve unusually high oxidation states, unlike their lanthanoid counterparts where the 4f4f orbitals are deeply buried and chemically inert.

Furthermore, assuming high oxidation state fluorides are stabilized by 'ionic lattice energy' is a classic Fajans' rule violation.

Quick Facts About This Question

Question Information

SubjectChemistry
ChapterRedox Reactions - Class 11 Part 2
ConceptAverage vs. Actual Oxidation State
Difficulty8
Cognitive Load7
Target Solve Time160 sec
AccessFree