Before You Begin
Question #44130
The Question
An actinoid oxide, \ce{M_xO_y} (Compound \textbf{P}), exhibits an average oxidation state of for the metal \ce{M}. Upon fluorination with excess \ce{F2(g)} at , \textbf{P} is completely converted into a volatile, diamagnetic, octahedral fluoride, \ce{MF6} (Compound \textbf{Q}). Compound \textbf{Q} is known to be a covalent molecule rather than an ionic solid.
Which of the following correctly identifies the actual oxidation states of \ce{M} in \textbf{P}, and the primary quantum mechanical reason for the stability of the oxidation state in \textbf{Q}?
Options
- A.
and ; Indirect relativistic expansion of orbitals, allowing their participation in strong covalent \ce{M-F} bonds.
- B.
and ; Relativistic contraction of orbitals, which shields the nuclear charge and stabilizes the \ce{M^{6+}} ionic lattice.
- C.
and ; High electronegativity of fluorine overcoming the inert pair effect of the electrons.
- D.
(delocalized); The small size of the \ce{F^-} ion minimizes steric hindrance around the central \ce{M} atom.
Check Your Answer
Correct Answer
Step-by-Step Solution
Explanation
How the Examiner Thinks
Exception_Exposure
Learn to identify edge cases and boundary exceptions that JEE examiners hide in math problems.
Concepts Behind This Question
Average vs. Actual Oxidation State|Actinoid Oxidation State Variety|Stability of High O.S. Fluorides/Oxides
Why This Question Is Tricky
Common Mistakes
This question tests the distinction between mathematical average oxidation states and actual discrete oxidation states in mixed-valence compounds (e.g., \ce{U3O8}).
The primary trap lies in the misapplication of 'Relativistic Contraction'.
Students often memorize that relativistic effects cause contraction (like the inert pair effect in post-transition metals).
However, they fail to realize that while and orbitals contract, and orbitals undergo indirect relativistic expansion.
This expansion is the exact reason why early actinoids (like U, Np, Pu) can utilize their orbitals for covalent bonding to achieve unusually high oxidation states, unlike their lanthanoid counterparts where the orbitals are deeply buried and chemically inert.
Furthermore, assuming high oxidation state fluorides are stabilized by 'ionic lattice energy' is a classic Fajans' rule violation.
Quick Facts About This Question
Question Information
| Subject | Chemistry |
| Chapter | Redox Reactions - Class 11 Part 2 |
| Concept | Average vs. Actual Oxidation State |
| Difficulty | 8 |
| Cognitive Load | 7 |
| Target Solve Time | 160 sec |
| Access | Free |