Start Learning Free

Before You Begin

Question #45012

Difficulty: 8/10 | 🟢 Free

The Question

The standard reduction potentials for the permanganate ion at 298 K298 \text{ K} are given as:

\ceMnO4−(aq)+8H+(aq)+5e−−>Mn2+(aq)+4H2O(l)\ce{MnO4^- (aq) + 8H^+ (aq) + 5e^- -> Mn^{2+} (aq) + 4H2O (l)}, E∘=1.51 VE^\circ = 1.51 \text{ V} \ceMnO4−(aq)+4H+(aq)+3e−−>MnO2(s)+2H2O(l)\ce{MnO4^- (aq) + 4H^+ (aq) + 3e^- -> MnO2 (s) + 2H2O (l)}, E∘=1.69 VE^\circ = 1.69 \text{ V}

A student constructs two half-cells at 298 K298 \text{ K}: Half-cell 1: 0.01 M \ceKMnO40.01 \text{ M } \ce{KMnO4} and 0.1 M \ceMnSO40.1 \text{ M } \ce{MnSO4} in an acidic buffer of pH=2\text{pH} = 2. Half-cell 2: 0.1 M \ceKMnO40.1 \text{ M } \ce{KMnO4} and excess solid \ceMnO2\ce{MnO2} in a neutral buffer of pH=7\text{pH} = 7.

Assuming the specified half-reactions are the sole determinants of the electrode potentials, what is the difference in the reduction potentials (E1−E2E_1 - E_2) of the two half-cells? (Take 2.303RTF=0.06 V\frac{2.303 RT}{F} = 0.06 \text{ V})

Options

  • A.

    0.196 V0.196 \text{ V}

  • B.

    −0.172 V-0.172 \text{ V}

  • C.

    0.188 V0.188 \text{ V}

  • D.

    −0.036 V-0.036 \text{ V}

Check Your Answer

Correct Answer

Step-by-Step Solution

Explanation

How the Examiner Thinks

Exception_Exposure

Learn to identify edge cases and boundary exceptions that JEE examiners hide in math problems.

Concepts Behind This Question

Half-Reaction Media Sensitivity|KMnO₄ Redox pH Dependency|Electrode Potential Dependencies

Why This Question Is Tricky

Common Mistakes

This problem tests the 'Nernstian Trap' in redox chemistry.

Students often memorize standard reduction potentials (E∘E^\circ) and assume that a higher E∘E^\circ implies a stronger oxidant under all conditions.

Here, E∘E^\circ for \ceMnO4−→\ceMnO2\ce{MnO4^-} \rightarrow \ce{MnO2} (1.69 V1.69 \text{ V}) is higher than for \ceMnO4−→\ceMn2+\ce{MnO4^-} \rightarrow \ce{Mn^{2+}} (1.51 V1.51 \text{ V}).

However, E∘E^\circ assumes [\ceH+]=1 M[\ce{H^+}] = 1 \text{ M} (pH=0\text{pH} = 0), which is physically contradictory for a 'neutral' medium reaction.

By forcing the calculation of the formal potential at the actual pH (pH 7\text{pH } 7 vs pH 2\text{pH } 2), the student must account for the Nernstian shift.

The trap also includes changing the n-factor (from 5 to 3), which alters the slope of the potential drop.

Failing to account for the pH dependency or the n-factor change leads to incorrect conclusions about the oxidizing power of \ceKMnO4\ce{KMnO4} in different media.

Quick Facts About This Question

Question Information

SubjectChemistry
ChapterRedox Reactions - Class 11 Part 2
ConceptHalf-Reaction Media Sensitivity
Difficulty8
Cognitive Load7
Target Solve Time160 sec
AccessFree